🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to find the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.